Revision dismissed in labor law wage dispute

BAG 4 AZR 232/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The plaintiff challenged in revision a judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The Federal Labour Court decided the case in written proceedings after the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons. It rejected the revision and left the appellate judgment in place. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; if the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision in written form without a full statement of facts and reasons. A revision that does not succeed is dismissed; the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 232/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 232/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 214/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 425/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 425/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswritten procedurewaiverlabor courtappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate labor judgment was admissible and successful.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court found no basis to overturn the lower court judgment in the written procedure used after the parties waived factual findings and reasons.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful revising party, the plaintiff bore the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.