Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 216/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The case was handled in the context of a parallel proceeding, and the parties waived findings of fact and reasons. The only dispositive points were the rejection of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; when parties waive findings of fact and reasons in a labor-law revision proceeding, the Federal Labor Court may decide without a full statement of facts and reasoning. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed and the revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 216/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 216/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 156/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 380/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 380/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisionlabor lawcostsparallel proceedingwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the appellate labor court judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The decision notes that, in light of the parallel proceedings, the parties waived findings of fact and reasons; the court therefore simply rejected the revision.

Key legal question

Allocation of revision costs.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful revising party, the plaintiff bears the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.