Revision dismissed in labor law appeal case

BAG 4 AZR 217/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court rejected the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The decision was issued in summary form because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel case. The only operative consequences were dismissal of the revision and allocation of the revision costs to the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; in a revision proceeding, the court may dispense with findings of fact and reasons if the parties waive them, including where reference is made to a parallel case. If the revision is rejected in this form, the costs of the revision are borne by the appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 217/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 217/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 161/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 381/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 381/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate labor court judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and therefore rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The court dismissed the revision in summary form; the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the costs were imposed on the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.