Revision dismissed; costs borne by employee

BAG 4 AZR 198/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court decided the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment in case 17 Sa 355/12 and rejected it. The extract contains no substantive discussion of the underlying employment dispute because, in light of the parallel case 4 AZR 50/13, the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons. The court ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; when the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel case, the appellate court may issue a judgment without a full statement of reasons. If the revision is dismissed, the revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 198/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 198/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 200/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 355/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 355/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingsstatement of facts waivedlabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The decision states only that the parties waived findings of fact and reasons in view of the parallel case; no further substantive reasoning is provided in the extract.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, the costs were imposed on the revising plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.