Revision dismissed in labor law wage dispute

BAG 4 AZR 202/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The plaintiff sought revision of a labor court judgment of the Hessian LAG. The Federal Labor Court dismissed the revision. The decision notes that, in view of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons. The plaintiff, as the unsuccessful revising party, was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive the statement of facts and the reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labor Court may issue a judgment without detailed factual findings and reasons. A revision that does not succeed is dismissed; the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 202/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 202/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 196/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 360/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 360/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the LAG judgment was well-founded.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and had to be dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court found no reason to disturb the appellate judgment; the parties had also waived detailed findings and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful revising party, the plaintiff was charged with the costs of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.