BAG 4 AZR 193/13•Revision dismissed in labour law case
BAG 4 AZR 193/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the Hessian Regional Labour Court’s judgment. The court noted that the parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons because of a parallel proceeding. The revision was therefore rejected, and the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case does not affect the power to decide the revision. If the revision is unfounded, it is dismissed and the revision costs are borne by the unsuccessful appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 193/13
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 173/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 350/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 350/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Creutzfeldt | Treber | Spinner | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schuldt | Kriegelsteiner |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the regional labour court judgment was well founded.
The revision was unfounded and had to be dismissed.
The decision contains no written statement of facts or reasons because the parties waived them in view of a parallel case; the court nonetheless rejected the revision.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.