Revision dismissed in labor law case

BAG 4 AZR 209/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The plaintiff pursued a revision before the Federal Labor Court against a judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court in a labor matter. Because the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel case, the Federal Labor Court decided the matter without a full statement of reasons. The court rejected the revision and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel case does not prevent the Federal Labor Court from dismissing an unfounded revision. If the revising party is unsuccessful, it bears the costs of the revision proceedings. The decision may be rendered in abbreviated form where the statutory requirements for omitting findings and reasons are met.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 209/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 209/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 204/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 373/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 373/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisionlabor lawcostsabbreviated reasoningparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court found no basis to overturn the appellate judgment; the parties had waived statement of facts and reasons in light of a parallel case.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful revising party, the plaintiff bears the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.