Revision dismissed in labor law case

BAG 4 AZR 197/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The plaintiff pursued revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labor Court of Appeal. The Federal Labor Court dismissed the revision. The court noted that, in view of a parallel proceeding, the parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in a parallel case. Where the parties validly waive a statement of facts and reasons, the judgment may be rendered without a detailed factual and legal exposition. In revision proceedings, the appellate court may therefore limit itself to the dispositive part and the cost order, provided the statutory conditions for such a shortened judgment are met.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 197/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 197/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 187/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 354/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 354/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaivershortened judgment

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; the document contains no further reasoning because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.