Revision dismissed in collective bargaining classification dispute

BAG 4 AZR 200/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court (4th Senate) dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht judgment of 19 November 2012. The court issued the decision without statement of facts and reasons because the parties waived them in view of a parallel case. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision without them. If the revision is dismissed, the appellant bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 200/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 200/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 243/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 358/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 358/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabor courtparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the lower judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court dismissed the revision; the decision was issued without factual findings and reasons because the parties waived them in light of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.