Revision dismissed in parallel labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 169/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The case was handled without a full statement of facts and reasons because the parties waived them in view of parallel proceedings. The court therefore left the appellate judgment in force and ordered the claimant to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in light of parallel proceedings, the Federal Labor Court may decide without a full statement of facts and reasons. A revision that is not successful is dismissed, and the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 169/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 169/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 245/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 326/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 326/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the Hessian Regional Labor Court judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment stood.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the revision after the parties waived a full statement of facts and reasons in light of the parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the claimant was ordered to bear the revision costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.