Revision dismissed in labor law wage classification case

BAG 4 AZR 162/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court, 4th Senate, rejected the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The case was handled without detailed facts and reasons because, in view of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived the statement of facts and the grounds of decision. The only operative consequence stated is that the plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties, in view of a parallel proceeding, waive the statement of facts and the reasons for the decision, the court may render a shortened judgment. In such a case, the revision is dismissed if the challenged appellate judgment is upheld; the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 162/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 162/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 162/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 319/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 319/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonslabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate labour judgment was admissible and successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision; the decision notes that, in light of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The dispositive part expressly assigns the costs of the revision to the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.