BAG 4 AZR 154/13•Revision dismissed; costs of revision borne by plaintiff
BAG 4 AZR 154/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labor Court. The parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons because of a parallel case. The only operative consequences were dismissal of the revision and allocation of the revision costs to the plaintiff.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; in revision proceedings the court may dispense with statement of facts and reasons where the parties have waived them, in particular in view of a parallel case. If the revision is unsuccessful, the revising party bears the costs of the revision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18
Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 154/13
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 224/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 292/12, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 4. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 292/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Creutzfeldt | Treber | Spinner | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schuldt | Kriegelsteiner |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the LAG judgment should be allowed.
The revision was dismissed.
The decision contains no substantive reasons because the parties waived statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding.
Allocation of the costs of the revision proceedings.
The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision was unsuccessful, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the revision costs.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.