Revision dismissed in parallel labor-law case

BAG 4 AZR 163/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court of Appeal. The case was dealt with without findings of fact and reasons because the parties had waived them in light of a parallel proceeding. The only operative part is the dismissal of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the appellate court may dispense with a full statement of facts and reasons. In revision, the Federal Labour Court then confines itself to the dispositive ruling; if the revision is unfounded, it is dismissed and the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 163/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 163/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 175/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 320/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 320/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate labor court judgment should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The decision was rendered without findings of fact and reasons because the parties had waived them in view of the parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The losing party bears the costs of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.