Revision dismissed in labor law tariff dispute

BAG 4 AZR 152/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The court noted that, in light of a parallel proceeding, the parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel case, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision without a reasoned statement in the usual form. If the revision is unsuccessful, the revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 152/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 152/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 222/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 290/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 290/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaiverlabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision and decided the case without findings of fact or reasons, with the parties having waived them in view of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The revision was unsuccessful, so the revising party bears the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.