Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 189/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons because of a parallel proceeding. The only operative consequences were dismissal of the revision and cost allocation against the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the appellate court may issue a decision without factual findings and reasons. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is dismissed and the unsuccessful party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 189/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 189/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 157/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 346/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 346/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaiverlabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and therefore dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; the record notes that, in view of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons under the cited procedural provisions.

Key legal question

Allocation of revision costs

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, the costs were imposed on the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.