Revision dismissed in collective bargaining dispute

BAG 4 AZR 184/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court rejected the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian LAG in an employment dispute. The court decided the case in light of a parallel proceeding and, according to the introductory note, dispensed with findings of fact and reasons. The operative part only states that the revision is dismissed and that the plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; revision proceedings may be decided without statement of facts and reasons where the statutory conditions are met, in particular when reference is made to a parallel case. In such a constell­ation, the court may confine itself to the dispositive part; the revision is dismissed if no ground for reversal is established. Cost allocation follows the failure of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 184/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 184/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 244/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 341/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 341/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingemployment disputereasoned judgment waiver

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court dismissed the revision; the decision was issued without findings of fact and reasons in light of the parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff bears the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The dispositive part assigns the costs of the revision to the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.