Revision dismissed in labor law parallel case

BAG 4 AZR 180/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court, 4th Senate, dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian State Labor Court. The court’s published text is limited because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel case. The only operative consequences stated are rejection of the revision and allocation of revision costs to the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: In proceedings in which the parties waive findings of fact and reasons because of a parallel case, the appellate court may dispense with a full statement of reasons; if the revision is dismissed, the costs of the revision are to be borne by the unsuccessful appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 180/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 180/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 178/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 337/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 337/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff’s revision against the appellate labor judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and therefore dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court rejected the revision; the available text indicates that the parties waived findings and reasons because of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, the plaintiff was ordered to pay the costs of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.