Revision dismissed in labor tariff dispute

BAG 4 AZR 178/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The court issued the decision without a statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them in view of a parallel case. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in revision proceedings: where the parties waive Tatbestand and Entscheidungsgründe in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labor Court may issue the judgment accordingly without further reasoning. If the revision is dismissed, the revising party bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 178/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 178/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 170/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 335/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 335/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisionlabor lawcostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision; the decision was issued without facts and reasons pursuant to the parties' waiver in connection with a parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of revision costs.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was charged with the revision costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.