Revision dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 153/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court decided the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht in case 17 Sa 291/12. The parties waived findings of fact and reasons because of a parallel proceeding. The revision was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the appellate court may issue a reasonless judgment under the statutory conditions. In revision proceedings, dismissal of the appeal entails cost allocation against the unsuccessful appellant. The excerpt does not contain any further substantive labor-law holding.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 153/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 153/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 223/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 291/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 291/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The judgment states only that the parties waived findings of fact and reasons in light of a parallel proceeding; no substantive reasoning is provided in the excerpt.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful appellant, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the revision costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.