Revision dismissed in labor law appeal

BAG 4 AZR 182/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court. The panel decided the case without a full statement of facts and reasons because the parties had waived them in light of a parallel proceeding. The only dispositive consequences were the rejection of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in revisional labor proceedings. Where the parties, in view of a parallel proceeding, waive the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment, the Federal Labor Court may decide accordingly without a full written judgment grounds section. If the revision is dismissed, the costs of the revision are to be borne by the unsuccessful appellant.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 182/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 182/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 160/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 339/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 339/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisionlabor lawcostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceeding

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Senate dismissed the revision; the decision was issued without factual findings and reasons because the parties waived them in light of a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the revision.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.