Revision dismissed in labor law tariff dispute

BAG 4 AZR 174/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment in a labor law dispute. The decision was issued without findings and reasons because, in light of a parallel case, the parties waived the statement of facts and the reasons for the judgment. The court also ordered the claimant to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; §§ 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel case, the Federal Labor Court may issue a judgment without factual findings and reasons. A revision that is not successful is dismissed; the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 174/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 174/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 195/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 331/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 331/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment was admissible and well-founded

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and had to be rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The court decided the case without findings and reasons because the parties waived them in view of the parallel proceeding; no basis was found to disturb the appellate judgment.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful revision appellant, the claimant bears the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.