Revision dismissed in collective bargaining dispute

BAG 4 AZR 155/13Bag / Division 4Jun 18, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court. The decision was issued in an employment law matter reviewed by the 4th Senate. In light of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived findings of fact and reasons. The court therefore left the appellate judgment undisturbed and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision without full written reasons; where the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the revising party bears the costs. The waiver in connection with a parallel case permits a shortened form of judgment (consid. 1).

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 155/13, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-06-18

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 155/13

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 8. Dezember 2011, Az: 10 Ca 225/11, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 19. November 2012, Az: 17 Sa 293/12, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 19. November 2012 - 17 Sa 293/12 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 50/13 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

CreutzfeldtTreberSpinner
SchuldtKriegelsteiner

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonsemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court found no basis to overturn the appellate judgment; the parties had waived statement of facts and reasons due to a parallel proceeding.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.