Revision dismissed in employment dispute; costs borne by claimant

BAG 6 AZR 811/12Bag / Division 6May 8, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Bundesarbeitsgericht dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the LAG Nürnberg. The decision was issued without statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them under § 313a ZPO. The only operative consequence beyond dismissal was that the claimant and counterclaim defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons by the parties; revision dismissed without written reasons. Where the parties have expressly waived the statement of facts and the reasons, the court may decide by short judgment. If the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the costs of the revision are borne by the appellant.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 811/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-05-08

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 811/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Nürnberg, 13. April 2011, Az: 7 Ca 5485/10, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Nürnberg, 15. Juni 2012, Az: 8 Sa 565/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Klägerin und Widerbeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Nürnberg vom 15. Juni 2012 - 8 Sa 565/11 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Klägerin und Widerbeklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

FischermeierGallnerSpelge
KochWollensak

Keywords

employment disputerevisioncostswaiver of reasonsshort judgment

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the judgment of the LAG Nürnberg is successful.

Extracted holding

The revision is unsuccessful and is dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision without a detailed written reasoning, as the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under § 313a ZPO.

Key legal question

Allocation of revision costs.

Extracted holding

The claimant and counterclaim defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the costs were imposed on the appellant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.