Revision dismissed in labor dispute; written reasons waived

BAG 6 AZR 810/12Bag / Division 6May 8, 2014Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff and counterdefendant's revision against the judgment of the LAG Nürnberg. The decision was rendered as a judgment without a statement of facts and reasons because the parties had waived them. The court ordered the plaintiff and counterdefendant to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons by the parties: If the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons, the appellate court may dispense with a written reasoning. In revision proceedings before the Federal Labour Court, a revision is dismissed if no ground for reversal is established; costs follow the outcome and are imposed on the unsuccessful party.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 810/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2014-05-08

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 810/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Nürnberg, 13. April 2011, Az: 7 Ca 5480/10, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Nürnberg, 15. Juni 2012, Az: 8 Sa 558/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Klägerin und Widerbeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Nürnberg vom 15. Juni 2012 - 8 Sa 558/11 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Klägerin und Widerbeklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

FischermeierGallnerSpelge
KochWollensak

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabor lawappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the LAG Nürnberg judgment should be allowed and succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court found no reason to overturn the appellate judgment; the decision was issued without factual statement and reasons by agreement of the parties under § 313a ZPO.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The plaintiff and counterdefendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the costs were imposed on the losing party.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.