Revision dismissed; wording of holiday duty corrected

BAG 6 AZR 287/12Bag / Division 6Oct 24, 2013Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the Hessian Regional Labour Court judgment. It only corrected the wording of paragraph 4 of the operative part, replacing 'in the week of 24 and 31 December' with 'for 24 December and 31 December'. The parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons under Section 313a ZPO. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; revision dismissed with only a textual correction of the operative part. Where the parties have waived findings of fact and reasons, the court may decide by abbreviated judgment. A mere clarification of the wording of the operative part is permissible if it does not alter the substantive outcome; the judgment otherwise remains unchanged. The unsuccessful revision entails the costs of the revision being borne by the appellant.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 287/12, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-10-24

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 287/12

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Darmstadt, 10. März 2011, Az: 8 Ca 539/10, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 10. Februar 2012, Az: 3 Sa 604/11, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 10. Februar 2012 - 3 Sa 604/11 - wird mit der Maßgabe zurückgewiesen, dass in Absatz 4 des Tenors die Worte „in der Woche des 24.12. und des 31.12.“ durch die Worte „für den 24.12. und den 31.12.“ ersetzt werden.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1 Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

FischermeierGallnerSpelge
AugatCl. Peter

Keywords

revisioncostsoperative partwording correctionabbreviated judgmentemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the appellate judgment should succeed

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court found no basis to overturn the appellate judgment.

Key legal question

Whether the wording in paragraph 4 of the operative part needed correction

Extracted holding

The wording was corrected from 'in the week of 24 and 31 December' to 'for 24 December and 31 December'.

Extracted reasoning

The operative part required a textual clarification, without changing the substance of the decision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.