Revision dismissed in BAG parallel-proceedings case

BAG 4 AZR 79/11Bag / Division 4Feb 27, 2013Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Hessian LAG. The parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons because the case was linked to the lead parallel proceeding 4 AZR 78/11. The only operative consequences were the dismissal of the revision and the order that the defendant bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

Art. 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; Art. 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; Art. 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in a parallel lead case does not preclude a judgment on the merits. Where the parties waive the grounds of decision in light of a parallel proceeding, the Federal Labour Court may decide without a written statement of facts and reasons; the revision is disposed of in accordance with the merits and the losing revising party bears the costs.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 79/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-02-27

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 79/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Kassel, 12. Mai 2010, Az: 9 Ca 53/10, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 30. Dezember 2010, Az: 3 Sa 895/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 30. Dezember 2010 - 3 Sa 895/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 78/11 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtTreber
StedingRupprecht

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonsemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the Hessian LAG judgment should be allowed to succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision; the decision was issued without statement of facts and reasons because the parties waived them in light of the parallel lead case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The defendant had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the losing revising party, the defendant was ordered to pay the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.