Revision dismissed in labor law parallel-case dispute

BAG 4 AZR 82/11Bag / Division 4Feb 27, 2013Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court decided a revision in a labor dispute after the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons because of a leading parallel case. The defendant's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labor Court was dismissed. The court also ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in a revision decision where the parties refer to a leading parallel case. If the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons in view of a parallel leading proceeding, the court may decide accordingly without a full factual statement and reasoning under the cited provisions; the revision is then disposed of by summary rejection, with costs following the outcome of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 82/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-02-27

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 82/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Kassel, 27. April 2010, Az: 6 Ca 632/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 30. Dezember 2010, Az: 3 Sa 1118/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 30. Dezember 2010 - 3 Sa 1118/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 78/11 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

EylertCreutzfeldtTreber
StedingRupprecht

Keywords

revisionlabor lawparallel casewaiver of reasonscosts

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the Hessian Regional Labor Court judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The parties waived a statement of facts and reasons in view of the leading parallel case 4 AZR 78/11; the Federal Labor Court therefore simply rejected the revision.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the costs were imposed on the defendant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.