BAG 10 AZR 865/11•Revision dismissed in employment dispute
BAG 10 AZR 865/11Bag / Division 10Jan 16, 2013Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court, 10th Senate, rejected the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Hessian Labour Court. The parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO, so the decision contains no substantive discussion. The defendant must bear the costs of the revision. The lower-court judgment therefore remains effective.
§ 313a ZPO; revision dismissed without written reasons where the parties have waived the statement of facts and reasons; the appellate judgment is left undisturbed and the costs of the revision are borne by the unsuccessful appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2013-01-16
Aktenzeichen: 10 AZR 865/11
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Frankfurt, 4. November 2010, Az: 3 Ca 10439/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 10. August 2011, Az: 18 Sa 97/11, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 10. Senat
Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 10. August 2011 - 18 Sa 97/11 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben gemäß § 313a ZPO auf die Darstellung von Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründen verzichtet.
| Mikosch | Mestwerdt | Schmitz-Scholemann | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiel | Stefan Fluri |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision against the appellate judgment was well-founded
The revision was unfounded and was rejected.
The decision contains no statement of reasons because the parties waived the presentation of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.