Revision dismissed; costs borne by defendant

BAG 8 AZR 574/11Bag / Division 8Oct 25, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant’s revision against the Cologne Labour Court judgment and ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the revision. The parties had waived a statement of facts and reasons, so the judgment was issued without them under the cited procedural provisions.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons, the court may dispense with written reasons in the judgment. In such a case, the dispositive part alone suffices, and a revision may be rejected without further elaboration in the judgment text; the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 574/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-10-25

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 574/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Siegburg, 11. November 2009, Az: 3 Ca 1897/09 G, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Köln, 25. Februar 2011, Az: 3 Sa 1470/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Köln vom 25. Februar 2011 - 3 Sa 1470/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
EimerC. Gothe

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabour lawappeal dismissal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the LAG Cologne judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The judgment contains no written facts or reasons because the parties waived them under the cited procedural provisions; the dispositive part nevertheless confirms the lower court judgment by rejecting the revision.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was dismissed, the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.