Revision dismissed; defendant bears costs

BAG 8 AZR 573/11Bag / Division 8Oct 25, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Cologne Regional Labour Court. The parties had waived the statement of facts and reasons. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: If the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide without a detailed statement of grounds; a revision dismissed in such circumstances results in the unsuccessful appellant bearing the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 573/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-10-25

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 573/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Siegburg, 17. September 2009, Az: 4 Ca 1652/09 G, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Köln, 25. Februar 2011, Az: 3 Sa 677/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Köln vom 25. Februar 2011 - 3 Sa 677/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
EimerGothe

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonslabour lawappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the LAG Cologne judgment was admissible and well-founded

Extracted holding

The revision had no success and was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the revision in full; the judgment contains no further reasoning because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful appellant, the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.