Revision dismissed; costs of appeal borne by defendant

BAG 8 AZR 577/11Bag / Division 8Oct 25, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Cologne Regional Labour Court. The court noted that the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under the cited procedural provisions. The only operative consequences are the rejection of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the defendant.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide without a full statement of reasons. A revision dismissed by the Federal Labour Court leaves the appealed judgment in force; the unsuccessful appellant bears the costs of the revision.

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 577/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-10-25

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 577/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Siegburg, 8. Januar 2010, Az: 3 Ca 1689/09 G, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Köln, 25. Februar 2011, Az: 3 Sa 671/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Köln vom 25. Februar 2011 - 3 Sa 671/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
EimerGothe

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsappellate reviewemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the LAG Cologne judgment should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the revision and thereby left the appellate judgment in place.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the unsuccessful appellant, the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.