Revision dismissed in labor dispute after waiver of reasons

BAG 10 AZR 237/11Bag / Division 10Jul 11, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court, 10th Senate, decided a revision in an employment dispute. The defendant challenged the Lower Saxony Regional Labour Court judgment, but the revision was rejected. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the revision. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under Section 313a ZPO, so the judgment contains no substantive reasoning.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a ZPO; revision judgment without reasons where parties waive findings and reasons. If the parties validly dispense with findings of fact and reasons, the court may issue a shortened judgment. The revision court may then dispose of the appeal by operative part only; the substantive review of the challenged judgment remains decisive for the outcome, but the judgment need not contain a written statement of reasons. Costs follow the unsuccessful revision.

Full text

BAG — 10 AZR 237/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-07-11

Aktenzeichen: 10 AZR 237/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Wilhelmshaven, 27. Juli 2010, Az: 1 Ca 145/10, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 7. Februar 2011, Az: 8 Sa 1360/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 10. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 7. Februar 2011 - 8 Sa 1360/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben gemäß § 313a ZPO auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet.

MikoschMestwerdtSchmitz-Scholemann
Rigo ZüfleA. Effenberger

Keywords

revisionemployment disputecostswaiver of reasonsappeal dismissal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the regional labour court judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision. The decision contains no further reasoning because the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under Section 313a ZPO.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.