Revision dismissed in employment dispute

BAG 6 AZR 744/10Bag / Division 6Jun 28, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the plaintiff’s revision against the judgment of the Lower Saxony Regional Labor Court. The decision notes that the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons pursuant to Section 313a ZPO. The only dispositive consequences stated are rejection of the revision and allocation of the revision costs to the plaintiff.

Omnilex headnote

Section 313a ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons: if the parties waive facts and reasons, the judgment may be rendered in abbreviated form. Where the revision is dismissed in the operative part, the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision. The Federal Labor Court need not provide a full factual recital or detailed reasons in such a judgment (consid. 1).

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 744/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-06-28

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 744/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Lüneburg, 27. April 2010, Az: 2 Ca 266/09 E, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 25. Oktober 2010, Az: 8 Sa 868/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 25. Oktober 2010 - 8 Sa 868/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .

FischermeierGallnerSpelge
JerchelHoffmann

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsabbreviated judgmentemployment law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Lower Saxony Regional Labor Court judgment should be admitted and succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the revision in its operative part and, due to waiver under Section 313a ZPO, did not set out facts or detailed reasons.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The unsuccessful revising party was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.