Revision dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 8 AZR 441/11Bag / Division 8May 10, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court decided the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Saxon Higher Labor Court and rejected it. The appellate judgment therefore remained in force. The court also ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs of the revision proceedings. The decision was issued without a statement of facts and reasons pursuant to the procedural waiver noted in the judgment.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may decide by judgment without a full statement of reasons. If the revision is dismissed, the revising party bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 441/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-10

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 441/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 8. April 2010, Az: 2 Ca 2975/09, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 25. November 2010, Az: 9 Sa 332/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 25. November 2010 - 9 Sa 332/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
F. AvenariusWroblewski

Keywords

revisioncostslabor lawappeal dismissalwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Saxon Higher Labor Court judgment should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court found no basis to overturn the appellate judgment; the decision was therefore left in force.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.