Revision dismissed in employment dispute

BAG 8 AZR 438/11Bag / Division 8May 10, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court rejected the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Saxon State Labor Court in an employment dispute. The decision was rendered without a statement of facts and without reasons because the parties had waived them under the cited procedural rules. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: Where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may render a judgment in abbreviated form; if the revision is unsuccessful, it is to be dismissed and the appellant bears the costs of the revision. The waiver of reasons does not affect the formal validity of the judgment (consid. 1).

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 438/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-10

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 438/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 8. April 2010, Az: 2 Ca 2978/09, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 25. November 2010, Az: 9 Sa 334/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 25. November 2010 - 9 Sa 334/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
F. AvenariusWroblewski

Keywords

revisioncostswaiver of reasonsemployment lawappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should be successful

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

The court rejected the revision. The decision was issued without findings of fact and reasons because the parties had waived them under the procedural provisions cited.

Key legal question

Who bears the costs of the revision

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision failed, the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.