Revision dismissed in labor dispute; revision costs borne by claimant

BAG 8 AZR 442/11Bag / Division 8May 10, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Saxon Regional Labor Court. The decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons because the parties had waived them under the cited procedural provisions. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasons in revision proceedings. If the parties validly waive the facts and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may issue a shortened judgment. An unsuccessful revision is dismissed and the revising party bears the costs of the revision proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 442/11, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-10

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 442/11

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 8. April 2010, Az: 2 Ca 2974/09, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 25. November 2010, Az: 9 Sa 331/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 25. November 2010 - 9 Sa 331/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
F. AvenariusWroblewski

Keywords

revisioncostswaiverlabor lawappeal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Saxon Regional Labor Court should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labor Court rejected the revision after the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under the cited procedural provisions.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

As the revision was unsuccessful, the claimant was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.