BAG 8 AZR 435/11•Revision dismissed in labor dispute
BAG 8 AZR 435/11Bag / Division 8May 10, 2012Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Bundesarbeitsgericht rejected the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht. The only dispositive consequence stated is that the plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision. The parties waived findings of fact and reasons pursuant to the cited procedural provisions, so the decision contains no substantive reasoning on the underlying employment dispute.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labor Court may decide without setting out a full factual background or reasons. A revision dismissed by the court leaves the appellate judgment in force; the unsuccessful revising party bears the costs of the revision.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-10
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 435/11
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 8. April 2010, Az: 2 Ca 2969/09, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 25. November 2010, Az: 9 Sa 327/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 25. November 2010 - 9 Sa 327/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Böck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Avenarius | Wroblewski |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate labor court judgment was admissible and well-founded
The revision was unsuccessful and the appellate judgment remained in force.
The Federal Labor Court dismissed the revision by rejecting it; no further reasoning is provided in the document because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.