Revision upheld; employee's appeal rejected

BAG 8 AZR 641/10Bag / Division 8May 10, 2012Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this labour-law revision, the Federal Labour Court set aside the Saxon Regional Labour Court's judgment and rejected the claimant's appeal against the Leipzig Labour Court judgment. The decision was issued under a waiver of findings of fact and reasons pursuant to the cited procedural provisions. Costs of the appeal and revision were imposed on the claimant.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may decide the revision in abbreviated form. If the revision succeeds, the appellate judgment is to be set aside and the appeal against the first-instance judgment dismissed; costs follow the outcome and are borne by the unsuccessful party.

Full text

BAG — 8 AZR 641/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-05-10

Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 641/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Leipzig, 17. Dezember 2009, Az: 1 Ca 2418/09, Urteilvorgehend Sächsisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 24. September 2010, Az: 3 Sa 83/10, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 8. Senat

Tenor

Auf die Revision des Beklagten wird das Urteil des Sächsischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 24. September 2010 - 3 Sa 83/10 - aufgehoben.

Die Berufung des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Leipzig vom 17. Dezember 2009 - 1 Ca 2418/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Kläger hat auch die Kosten der Berufung und Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

HauckBöckBreinlinger
F. AvenariusWroblewski

Keywords

revisionappealcostswaiver of reasonslabour courtappellate judgmentprocedural form

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision should succeed and the appellate judgment be set aside.

Extracted holding

The revision was successful; the appellate judgment was set aside.

Extracted reasoning

The court disposed of the case without full reasons because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons.

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's appeal against the first-instance judgment should be upheld.

Extracted holding

The claimant's appeal was rejected, leaving the first-instance judgment in place.

Extracted reasoning

After setting aside the appellate judgment, the court rejected the appeal against the labour court judgment.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the appeal and revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the appeal and revision.

Extracted reasoning

The final disposition places the procedural costs on the claimant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.