Revision dismissed in labor appeal case

BAG 4 AZR 414/10Bag / Division 4Jan 25, 2012Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Berlin-Brandenburg Regional Labor Court. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons because of a parallel proceeding. The only dispositive points were the dismissal of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the defendant.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in parallel proceedings: Where the parties waive the statement of facts and reasons, the appellate court may decide without a full written reasoning. In such a case, the Federal Labor Court may also dispose of the revision by short judgment; the absence of detailed reasons does not affect the validity of the dispositive ruling, provided the procedural prerequisites for the waiver are met (consid. 1).

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 414/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-01-25

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 414/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Berlin, 17. September 2009, Az: 33 Ca 9597/09, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 6. Mai 2010, Az: 14 Sa 2456/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 6. Mai 2010 - 14 Sa 2456/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 264/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

BeplerCreutzfeldtTreber
KieferHardebusch

Keywords

revisionlabor lawwaiver of reasonsparallel proceedingscosts

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision against the appellate labor judgment should succeed.

Extracted holding

The revision was unsuccessful and was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision contains no substantive reasoning because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under the cited procedural provisions.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.