BAG 5 AZR 240/11•Revision dismissed in an employment case
BAG 5 AZR 240/11Bag / Division 5Mar 21, 2012Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
In this employment dispute, the Federal Labour Court rejected the defendant's revision against the judgment of the Berlin-Brandenburg Regional Labour Court. The decision contains no substantive reasoning because the parties waived a statement of facts and reasons under § 313a ZPO. The only operative consequence expressly stated is that the defendant must bear the costs of the revision.
§ 313a ZPO; waiver of facts and reasons; revision dismissed and costs follow the outcome. Where the parties waive a statement of facts and reasons, the court may issue a shortened judgment without substantive reasons. If the revision is dismissed, the losing party bears the costs of the revision proceedings.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-03-21
Aktenzeichen: 5 AZR 240/11
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Potsdam, 24. Februar 2010, Az: 6 Ca 2063/09, Urteilvorgehend LArbG Berlin-Brandenburg, 12. November 2010, Az: 9 Sa 1239/10, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 5. Senat
Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Berlin-Brandenburg vom 12. November 2010 - 9 Sa 1239/10 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 313a ZPO) .
| Müller-Glöge | Laux | Biebl | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoller | Pollert |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision against the Berlin-Brandenburg Regional Labour Court judgment should succeed.
The revision was unsuccessful and was dismissed.
No reasons were set out because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under § 313a ZPO.
Who bears the costs of the revision proceedings.
The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.
The dismissal of the revision left the defendant as the losing party in the appellate instance.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.