Employer ordered to pay gross amount after successful revision

BAG 6 AZR 574/10Bag / Division 6Feb 16, 2012Modified

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court decided the revision in a labor dispute by reference to a lead case. It set aside the judgment of the Lower Saxony Regional Labor Court and amended the Labor Court Göttingen judgment. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff EUR 354.55 gross plus interest at five percentage points above the base rate from 1 January 2009. The defendant also had to bear the costs of the proceedings. The parties waived a statement of facts and reasons for this case.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons and the case is decided by reference to a lead proceeding, the judgment may be rendered without a separate statement of facts and reasons. The dispositive part alone suffices, provided the reference to the companion case makes the legal assessment clear and the procedural prerequisites for an abbreviated judgment are met.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 574/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2012-02-16

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 574/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Göttingen, 18. November 2009, Az: 3 Ca 68/09, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 22. April 2010, Az: 4 Sa 1550/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 22. April 2010 - 4 Sa 1550/09 - aufgehoben.

  2. Auf die Berufung der Klägerin wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Göttingen vom 18. November 2009 - 3 Ca 68/09 - abgeändert.

  3. Die Beklagte wird verurteilt, an die Klägerin 354,55 Euro brutto nebst Zinsen in Höhe von fünf Prozentpunkten über dem Basiszinssatz seit dem 1. Januar 2009 zu zahlen.

  4. Die Beklagte hat die Kosten des Rechtsstreits zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Verfahren - 6 AZR 573/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

FischermeierBrühlerSpelge
SchäferkordB. Bender

Keywords

revisionlabor disputewaiver of reasonsinterestcostsabbreviated judgment

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the regional labor court judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was successful; the appellate judgment was set aside.

Extracted reasoning

The court disposed of this case by reference to the lead proceeding 6 AZR 573/10 and therefore did not set out separate findings or reasons.

Key legal question

Whether the defendant owed the plaintiff gross payment of EUR 354.55 plus interest

Extracted holding

The defendant was ordered to pay EUR 354.55 gross plus default interest from 1 January 2009.

Extracted reasoning

The appellate and first-instance judgments were amended in favor of the plaintiff, resulting in a payment order.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.