Revision allowed; appeal dismissed in labor dispute

BAG 4 AZR 812/09Bag / Division 4Oct 19, 2011Confirmed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court decided a labor appeal in which the parties had waived a full statement of facts and reasons because of a parallel lead case. On the defendant's revision, the court set aside the judgment of the Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm and restored the first-instance judgment of the Arbeitsgericht Paderborn by rejecting the claimant's appeal. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; where the parties waive findings of fact and reasons in view of a lead parallel case, the appellate court may decide the revision without a full statement of reasons. If the revision succeeds, the appellate judgment is set aside and the appeal against the first-instance judgment is rejected; the unsuccessful party bears the costs of the appeal and revision.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 812/09, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-10-19

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 812/09

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Paderborn, 8. April 2009, Az: 2 Ca 1810/08, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm (Westfalen), 5. November 2009, Az: 17 Sa 725/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision der Beklagten wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Hamm vom 5. November 2009 - 17 Sa 725/09 - aufgehoben:

Die Berufung des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Paderborn vom 8. April 2009 - 2 Ca 1810/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  1. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 811/09 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet ( § 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG , § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO ) .

BeplerCreutzfeldtTreber
BredendiekTh. Hess

Keywords

revisionappealcostsparallel proceedingswaiver of reasonslabor law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the defendant's revision succeeded against the judgment of the Landesarbeitsgericht.

Extracted holding

The Federal Labor Court set aside the appellate judgment and rejected the claimant's appeal against the first-instance judgment.

Extracted reasoning

The parties waived findings of fact and reasons in view of the lead parallel case; the court disposed of the revision accordingly.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the appeal and revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The claimant must bear the costs of the appeal and revision.

Extracted reasoning

Costs followed the unsuccessful appeal and revision.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.