Recognition judgment without facts and reasons

BAG 9 AZR 338/10Bag / Division 9Oct 18, 2011Granted

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

In this labour case, the Federal Labour Court decided by recognition judgment. Because the defendant acknowledged the claim, the court dispensed with a statement of facts and reasons under § 313b(1) sentence 1 ZPO. The court set aside the Munich Higher Labour Court judgment, amended the Augsburg Labour Court judgment, and ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff EUR 9,203.00 gross plus interest at five percentage points above the base rate since 1 December 2008. The defendant was ordered to bear the costs.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313b Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO; recognition judgment without statement of facts and reasons: If the defendant acknowledges the claim, the court may issue a recognition judgment without a factual statement and reasons. The acknowledgment also justifies granting the acknowledged claim by judgment under § 307 ZPO. In such a case, the appellate judgments below are to be set aside or amended in accordance with the acknowledgment; costs follow the result of the acknowledgment and are borne by the defendant.

Full text

BAG — 9 AZR 338/10, Anerkenntnisurteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2011-10-18

Aktenzeichen: 9 AZR 338/10

Dokumenttyp: Anerkenntnisurteil

Normen: § 307 ZPO, § 313b Abs 1 S 1 ZPO

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Augsburg, 18. November 2009, Az: 10 Ca 4151/08, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht München, 30. März 2010, Az: 6 Sa 1199/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 9. Senat

Titelzeile

Anerkenntnisurteil - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe

Tenor

Auf die Revision des Klägers wird das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts München vom 30. März 2010 - 6 Sa 1199/09 - aufgehoben. Auf die Berufung des Klägers wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Augsburg vom 18. November 2009 - 10 Ca 4151/08 - abgeändert und die Beklagte verurteilt, an den Kläger einen Bruttobetrag iHv. 9.203,00 Euro nebst Zinsen iHv. fünf Prozentpunkten über dem Basiszinssatz seit dem 1. Dezember 2008 zu zahlen.

Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Rechtsstreits.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Von der Darstellung des Tatbestands und der Entscheidungsgründe wird abgesehen (§ 313b Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO) . Die Beklagte hat den Klageanspruch anerkannt.

DüwellKrasshöferSuckow
StarkeHeilmann

Keywords

recognition judgmentlabor lawcostsinterestappellate reversal

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether a recognition judgment may be issued without statement of facts and reasons under § 313b(1) sentence 1 ZPO.

Extracted holding

Yes. Because the defendant acknowledged the claim, the court dispensed with the statement of facts and reasons.

Extracted reasoning

The judgment expressly notes that the defendant admitted the claim, which allows a recognition judgment without reasons under § 313b(1) sentence 1 ZPO.

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to payment of EUR 9,203.00 gross plus default interest from 1 December 2008.

Extracted holding

Yes. The defendant was ordered to pay the claimed gross amount plus interest at five percentage points above the base rate from 1 December 2008.

Extracted reasoning

The claim was acknowledged by the defendant, and the lower judgments were set aside and amended accordingly.

Key legal question

Allocation of the costs of the proceedings.

Extracted holding

The defendant bears the costs of the dispute.

Extracted reasoning

As the losing party after acknowledgment of the claim, the defendant was ordered to bear costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.