Revision dismissed in pension dispute

BAG 3 AZR 428/08Bag / Division 3Sep 29, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court dismissed the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Lower Saxony Regional Labour Court. The court stated that it omitted the facts and reasons because no further appeal was admissible and the parties had waived reasons. The plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Omnilex headnote

Section 313a(1) ZPO; when no further appeal is admissible and the parties waive reasons, the court may dispense with the statement of facts and reasons. In such a case, the revision is dismissed and costs are allocated against the unsuccessful party in accordance with the outcome of the proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 3 AZR 428/08, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-09-29

Aktenzeichen: 3 AZR 428/08

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Oldenburg (Oldenburg), 13. Februar 2007, Az: 5 Ca 450/06 B, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Niedersachsen, 28. März 2008, Az: 10 Sa 1089/07 B, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 3. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Niedersachsen vom 28. März 2008 - 10 Sa 1089/07 B - wird zurückgewiesen.

Der Kläger hat die Kosten des Revisionsverfahrens zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Von der Darstellung des Tatbestands und der Entscheidungsgründe wird abgesehen, da ein Rechtsmittel gegen das Urteil nicht zulässig ist und die Parteien auf die Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet haben (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO) .

GräflZwanzigerSchlewing
SuckaleG. Kanzleiter

Keywords

revisioncostsinadmissible appeallabour lawwaiver of reasons

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the appellate judgment should be allowed

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court rejected the revision and dispensed with facts and reasons under Section 313a(1) ZPO because no further appeal was admissible and the parties waived reasons.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The plaintiff must bear the costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted reasoning

The losing party was ordered to bear the costs.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.