Revision dismissed; no reasons under § 313a(1) ZPO

BAG 2 AZR 956/08Bag / Division 2Feb 23, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court (2nd Senate) dismissed the employee’s revision against the judgment of the Baden-Württemberg Regional Labour Court. The court ordered the appellant to bear the costs of the revision. The decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons pursuant to § 313a(1) ZPO.

Omnilex headnote

§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; revision dismissed by summary judgment without statement of facts or reasons. Where the court dispenses with findings of fact and reasons under § 313a(1) ZPO, the operative part may be confined to dismissing the revision and allocating costs; no further reasoning is published. The dismissal of the revision entails that the appellant bears the costs of the review proceedings.

Full text

BAG — 2 AZR 956/08, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-02-23

Aktenzeichen: 2 AZR 956/08

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 23. November 2007, Az: 1 Ca 533/06, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 17. Juni 2008, Az: 14 Sa 6/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 2. Senat

Tenor

Die Revision der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Mannheim - vom 17. Juni 2008 - 14 Sa 6/08 - wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Von der Darstellung des Tatbestandes und der Entscheidungsgründe wird abgesehen (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO).

KreftBergerSchmitz-Scholemann
Dr. RoecklK. Schierle

Keywords

revisioncostssummary judgmentlabour lawappellate review

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the employee’s revision against the regional labour court judgment was successful

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The court upheld the lower judgment and saw no basis for altering it; the decision was issued without a statement of facts or reasons under § 313a(1) ZPO.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the revision proceedings

Extracted holding

The appellant had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The dismissal of the revision led to costs being imposed on the appellant.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.