Revision dismissed in labour collective agreement case

BAG 4 AZR 16/09Bag / Division 4Aug 25, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court decided the plaintiff's revision against the judgment of the Schleswig-Holstein Higher Labour Court. The court dismissed the revision and ordered the plaintiff to bear the costs. The text contains no substantive reasoning because, in view of a parallel proceeding (4 AZR 14/09), the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under the cited procedural provisions.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of findings of fact and reasons in view of a parallel proceeding. Where the parties validly waive the statement of facts and reasons, the Federal Labour Court may issue a shortened judgment form. The dispositive judgment is limited to the appeal outcome and cost allocation; no further substantive reasoning is set out.

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 16/09, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-08-25

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 16/09

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Lübeck, 6. Mai 2008, Az: ö. D. 6 Ca 407 b/08, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Schleswig-Holstein, 6. November 2008, Az: 4 Sa 248/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Schleswig-Holstein vom 6. November 2008 - 4 Sa 248/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 14/09 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

BeplerWinterTreber
H. KlotzDierßen

Keywords

revisioncostsparallel proceedingwaiver of reasonslabour law

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the plaintiff's revision against the Schleswig-Holstein LAG judgment should be allowed.

Extracted holding

The revision was dismissed; the appellate judgment remained in force.

Extracted reasoning

No substantive reasoning is provided because the parties waived findings of fact and reasons under the cited procedural provisions due to a parallel case.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The plaintiff had to bear the costs of the revision.

Extracted reasoning

The dispositive part expressly assigns the revision costs to the plaintiff.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.