BAG 2 AZR 660/08•Revision dismissed in labor dispute; no reasons given
BAG 2 AZR 660/08Bag / Division 2Feb 23, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
In a labor-law revision proceeding, the Bundesarbeitsgericht rejected the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg. The court issued a short judgment without stating facts or reasons, relying on Section 313a(1) ZPO. The claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the revision proceedings.
Art. 313a Abs. 1 ZPO; summary judgment without statement of facts and reasons; the court may dispense with the presentation of the facts and the reasoning if the statutory conditions are met. In such a case, only the dispositive part and the essential formal elements are set out; a full written justification is not required. A revision dismissed in this form remains subject to ordinary cost allocation against the unsuccessful appellant.
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-02-23
Aktenzeichen: 2 AZR 660/08
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Karlsruhe, 17. August 2007, Az: 1 Ca 466/06, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Baden-Württemberg, 25. März 2008, Az: 16 Sa 86/07, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 2. Senat
Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Baden-Württemberg - Kammern Mannheim - vom 25. März 2008 - 16 Sa 86/07 - wird auf seine Kosten zurückgewiesen.
1
Von der Darstellung des Tatbestandes und der Entscheidungsgründe wird abgesehen (§ 313a Abs. 1 ZPO).
| Kreft | Berger | Schmitz-Scholemann | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Roeckl | K. Schierle |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the claimant's revision against the appellate labor court judgment should be upheld
The revision was rejected.
The court gave no statement of facts or reasons, invoking Section 313a(1) ZPO.
Allocation of costs of the revision proceedings
The claimant must bear the costs of the revision.
Costs followed the dismissal of the revision.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.