Revision dismissed in labor dispute under simplified reasoning

BAG 4 AZR 9/09Bag / Division 4Aug 25, 2010Dismissed

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labor Court dismissed the claimant's revision against the judgment of the Schleswig-Holstein Higher Labor Court. The court noted that, in view of a parallel proceeding, the parties waived the statement of facts and reasons. The only dispositive points were the rejection of the revision and the allocation of revision costs to the claimant.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1 ZPO, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO; waiver of statement of facts and reasoning in a parallel case permits a shortened judgment form. Where the parties dispense with the factual and legal grounds, the court may decide by reference to the parallel proceeding without setting out a full factual recitation or reasons, provided the procedural prerequisites for a reasonless judgment are met (consid. not stated).

Full text

BAG — 4 AZR 9/09, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-08-25

Aktenzeichen: 4 AZR 9/09

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Lübeck, 8. Mai 2008, Az: 1 Ca 171 b/08, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht Schleswig-Holstein, 11. November 2008, Az: 5 Sa 215/08, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 4. Senat

Tenor

  1. Die Revision des Klägers gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts Schleswig-Holstein vom 11. November 2008 - 5 Sa 215/08 - wird zurückgewiesen.

  2. Der Kläger hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das Parallelverfahren - 4 AZR 14/09 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

BeplerWinterTreber
H. KlotzDierßen

Keywords

revisionlabor disputecostswaiver of reasoningparallel proceeding

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's revision against the Schleswig-Holstein Higher Labor Court judgment was successful.

Extracted holding

The revision was unfounded and was rejected.

Extracted reasoning

The decision was issued without factual and reasoning sections under the procedural waiver for the parallel case, and the lower court judgment remained unchanged.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.