BAG 8 AZR 652/09•Revision dismissed in transfer-of-business objection case
BAG 8 AZR 652/09Bag / Division 8Nov 11, 2010Dismissed
Extracted by Omnilex
The Federal Labour Court dismissed the defendant's revision against the Munich Regional Labour Court judgment in a labour dispute concerning objection after a transfer of business. The court ordered the defendant to bear the costs of the revision. The decision notes that the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons under the cited procedural provisions, so the published text contains only the operative part.
§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 S. 1 ZPO; § 313a Abs. 1 S. 2 ZPO: If the parties waive findings of fact and reasons, the appellate court may issue a judgment without Tatbestand and Entscheidungsgründe. In such a case, the published decision may contain only the dispositive part; the merits are not set out in the text. A revision that is rejected on this basis leads to cost allocation against the unsuccessful revising party (consid. not stated).
Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-11-11
Aktenzeichen: 8 AZR 652/09
Dokumenttyp: Urteil
Normen: § 72 Abs 5 ArbGG, § 313a Abs 1 S 2 ZPO, § 555 Abs 1 S 1 ZPO
Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG München, 23. September 2008, Az: 33a Ca 10587/07, Urteilvorgehend Landesarbeitsgericht München, 23. Juli 2009, Az: 3 Sa 118/09, Urteil
Spruchkörper: 8. Senat
Betriebsübergang - Widerspruch - Urteil ohne Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe
Die Revision der Beklagten gegen das Urteil des Landesarbeitsgerichts München vom 23. Juli 2009 - 3 Sa 118/09 - wird zurückgewiesen.
Die Beklagte hat die Kosten der Revision zu tragen.
1
Die Parteien haben auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG, § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .
| Hauck | Hauck | Breinlinger | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Döring | Schuckmann |
Extracted by Omnilex
Whether the defendant's revision against the Munich Regional Labour Court judgment should succeed
The revision was unfounded and therefore dismissed.
The judgment states only the dispositive outcome; the parties had waived findings of fact and reasons, so no further merits reasoning is recorded.
Allocation of costs of the revision
The defendant must bear the costs of the revision.
As the revision was unsuccessful, the defendant was ordered to pay the revision costs.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.