projects

Appeal partly inadmissible in BAT pay-grade dispute

BAG 6 AZR 130/10Bag / Division 6Oct 19, 2010Partially Granted

Open source

Extracted by Omnilex

Omnilex summary

The Federal Labour Court partly set aside the judgment of the Hessian Regional Labour Court in a BAT pay-grade dispute. It held the claimant's appeal inadmissible insofar as she sought a declaration that the defendant state had to pay basic salary according to pay group IIa, highest age step, for the period from 1 August 2008 to 31 December 2009. The court also ordered the claimant to bear the costs of the appeal and revision. The parties had waived findings of fact and reasons because of a parallel lead case.

Omnilex headnote

§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO: In proceedings following a parallel lead case, the court may dispense with findings of fact and reasons. If the revision succeeds only in part and the challenged appellate relief is inadmissible, the Federal Labour Court sets aside the appellate judgment to that extent and dismisses the appeal as inadmissible; the unsuccessful party bears the costs of the appeal and revision.

Full text

BAG — 6 AZR 130/10, Urteil

Entscheidungsdatum: 2010-10-19

Aktenzeichen: 6 AZR 130/10

Dokumenttyp: Urteil

Vorinstanz: vorgehend ArbG Marburg, 17. April 2009, Az: 2 Ca 167/09, Urteilvorgehend Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht, 6. Januar 2010, Az: 2 Sa 1127/09, Urteil

Spruchkörper: 6. Senat

Tenor

  1. Auf die Revision des beklagten Landes wird das Urteil des Hessischen Landesarbeitsgerichts vom 6. Januar 2010 - 2 Sa 1127/09 - teilweise aufgehoben.

  2. Die Berufung der Klägerin gegen das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Marburg vom 17. April 2009 - 2 Ca 167/09 - wird im Umfang der Feststellung, dass das beklagte Land verpflichtet ist, der Klägerin Grundvergütung nach der Vergütungsgruppe II a der Anlage 1a zum BAT nach der höchsten Lebensaltersstufe dieser Vergütungsgruppe für die Zeit vom 1. August 2008 bis zum 31. Dezember 2009 zu zahlen, als unzulässig verworfen.

  3. Die Klägerin hat die Kosten der Berufung und der Revision zu tragen.

Sonstige Leitsätze

1

Die Parteien haben im Hinblick auf das führende Parallelverfahren - 6 AZR 118/10 - auf Tatbestand und Entscheidungsgründe verzichtet (§ 72 Abs. 5 ArbGG; § 555 Abs. 1 Satz 1, § 313a Abs. 1 Satz 2 ZPO) .

FischermeierBrühlerSpelge
BeusUwe Zabel

Keywords

employment remunerationpay gradeappeal admissibilitycostsparallel proceedings

Extracted by Omnilex

Key legal questions extracted by Omnilex

Key legal question

Whether the claimant's appeal was admissible insofar as it sought a declaration that the defendant must pay basic salary under pay group IIa at the highest age step for 1 August 2008 to 31 December 2009.

Extracted holding

That part of the appeal was inadmissible and had to be dismissed.

Extracted reasoning

The Federal Labour Court set aside the appellate judgment only in part and, as to the challenged declaration, rejected the appeal as inadmissible. The decision was issued without findings of fact and reasons due to the parallel lead proceedings.

Key legal question

Allocation of costs for the appeal and revision proceedings.

Extracted holding

The claimant had to bear the costs of the appeal and revision.

Extracted reasoning

The operative part expressly imposed the costs on the claimant after the partial setting aside and dismissal of the appeal segment.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.